
Welcome to the Utilization Report, where Dwain McFarland highlights his top fantasy football takeaways heading into Week 3.

Welcome to the Utilization Report, where Dwain McFarland highlights his top fantasy football takeaways heading into Week 3.
Let's follow the data to identify the top waiver wire options, trade targets, upgrades, and downgrades based on what we learned in Week 2.
If you love all the sweet Utilization data below, you can access all of it for yourself!
Get 20% off a Tier 2 FantasyLife+ subscription by using code: Dwain.
Use the Utilization Report suite of tools to dominate your league, y'all!
RELATED: For Week 3 waiver wire adds, read here!

Odunze has the No. 2 WR Utilization Score (96) after two games, trailing Malik Nabers and one spot ahead of CeeDee Lamb.

The former No. 9 overall NFL Draft pick has an outstanding 30% target share and 46% air yards share. He rarely leaves the field with a 96% route participation rate.
We are only two games in, so the sample is small, but Odunze's historical Utilization comps have smashed. Since 2020, WRs with a Utilization Score between 90 and 100 have averaged 21.3 points per game, with 100% of them finishing as top-six options.
The Bears' passing attack still isn't thriving, and the battle for targets could increase as the rookies find their legs, but right now Odunze is dominating.
Odunze UPGRADES to WR2 status and will enter WR1 territory if he keeps his Utilization Score over 90 in the next two games.
Kraft boasts the No. 6 Utilization Score (82) through two games. He leads the Packers in route participation at 81% and target share with 21%.

The third-year TE has morphed from an underneath yards-after-the-catch (YAC) monster into a weapon who can also attack downfield and add to the catch with a 9.8 average depth of target (aDOT). Kraft is averaging 9.1 yards after the catch (2nd) and 17.5 yards per reception.
Since 2020, TEs with a similar Utilization Score have averaged 12.2 fantasy points per game, with the majority posting a TE4 to TE6 finish.
With Jayden Reed now out for at least six weeks due to a collarbone injury, the competition for targets in Green Bay is as low as ever with Matthew Golden still stuck in a part-time role.
Kraft UPGRADES to top-six TE status and offers top-three upside.
In Week 1, the cope was firm among the Williams haters—he wasn't efficient. Welp. Throw that out the window. Williams ranks 11th in rushing yards per attempt (4.6) and yards after contact (3.4) after two contests. He has galloped for 10-plus yards on 12% of his attempts (9th).
Williams was breaking tackles and regularly gaining access to the second level of the defense in Week 2.
The Cowboys' new lead back offers the No. 6 Utilization Score with an 88. That puts him in company with hanes like Chuba Hubbard and Jonathan Taylor.

With a defense that can't stop anyone and a passing attack that should provide the run game with plenty of scoring chances, Williams is in a strong situation for the foreseeable future—Jaydon Blue was inactive again in Week 2.
Williams' closest Utilization Score comps averaged 16.9 fantasy points per game. They were all top-18 options.
Williams UPGRADES to borderline RB2 status, and there is a version of 2025 where he cracks the top-six.
Thomas is off to a disappointing start, averaging 8.9 points per game. His Week 2 performance wasn't good, dropping a ball, giving up on a ball, worrying about the hit, and failing to win in traffic. Some will even tell you the body language was bad.
You know what that sounds like to me? A great chance to buy low on a player who was one of the best receivers in the NFL to finish 2024.
While others worry about his performance, let's keep in mind that Trevor Lawrence—who has a vested interest in throwing the ball to his best players—has peppered this man with nine targets (26%) and 127.5 air yards per game (46%).

Since 2012, 41 WRs have averaged between eight and 10 targets per game with 115 to 140 air yards per game. Their average fantasy finish was WR12 with 17 points per game.
So 64% of the time, this type of player has been a top-12 option, and the most significant cohort were WR1 to WR6 finishers.
I know some of you are wondering about the non-top-24 finishers, so here is the list:
The sharp move is to bet on BTJ's performances turning around over a larger sample of games. Securing Thomas at a low-end WR1 price leaves room to profit, and anything below that could be a homerun considering the historical hit rates.
It was a little later than this, but Jacobs was one of my top buy-low candidates in 2024. The circumstances were eerily similar, with Jacobs dominating the Packers' backfield but not dominating the box scores.
Through two games, Jacobs is averaging 14.2 points per game, but he is bogarting all of the RB work in Title Town. The veteran back has accounted for 84% of the rushing attempts (21 per game) with an 82% snap share. He shares some time in the receiving game but still offers a healthy 54% route participation.

Since 2012, RBs who averaged 19 to 23 attempts per game have finished as the RB5 on average with 19.5 points per game.
We can also expect some positive regression in the target department, given the woes at the WR position for the Packers. Jacobs posted a 9% target share in 2024.
On a team with a potent offense and a high-powered defense, things set up well for Jacobs and his TD upside. Last year, Jacobs averaged 10.8 points over the first four games before averaging 19.8 points from Week 5 through the fantasy championship in Week 17.
Jacobs profiles like a 20-point-per-game option, making him a great player to kick the tires on with a trade offer.
Including the Week 2 game, we now have an eight-game sample where Jake Browning played at least 70% of the snaps since 2023. Below is how he stacks up with Burrow.
While Browning is obviously a step down from Burrow, he has kept things respectable.
Chase has played over 70% of the passing plays in seven of those eight games, averaging 15.9 points. However, scored 12 points or less in five of seven games.
Higgins played over 70% of the passing plays in six of eight games with Browning. He averaged 17.7 points. He scored 12 points or fewer in two games.
The main takeaway here isn't to say Higgins is better than Chase with Browning—the sample is too small. The overarching takeaway is that while both WRs take a hit without Burrow, they don't deserve massive downgrades.
Ja'Marr Chase DOWNGRADES to mid-range WR1 territory and Tee Higgins DOWNGRADES to borderline WR2 territory.
Through two games, we have some offenses leaning heavily into the ground game. Unfortunately, all three of the most run-heavy units have talented WRs on their team who are suffering.
Not only do these teams run a ton, they have QBs who turn many of their precious dropbacks into scrambles.
When you add it all up, this is terrible news for A.J. Brown, DeVonta Smith, Justin Jefferson, and Garrett Wilson.

It's hard to keep players like Wilson and Jefferson (41% and 33% target shares) down in the Utilization Score, but that is precisely what is happening in these gross offenses. You guys have lived the pain before with Smith and Brown. Welcome to Chapter 2.
Wilson is a boom-bust high-end WR3.
Jefferson DOWNGRADES to mid-range WR1 territory and will fall to the low-end WR1 zipcode if the Vikings don't change over the next two games. We could see something different with McCarthy expected to miss two to four games with a high-ankle sprain. Carson Wentz will start.
Smith DOWNGRADES to low-end WR3 territory and is heading for WR4 status if the Eagles don't change.
Brown DOWNGRADES to mid-range WR2 territory.
Let me begin with a sincere apology to everyone who followed my advice and drafted Henderson or Harvey. I go through an extensive process to craft my rankings, but I am an aggressive drafter and pushed the envelope too far on Henderson.
My biggest hangup is that I took Henderson over proven players like James Cook so often, despite being aware of the uncertainty surrounding Henderson's role. We want to embrace uncertainty, but not at all costs. As Henderson's price tag rose, I should have adjusted.
Having said that, I stuck it out with rising price tags on Malik Nabers and Jayden Daniels last year, and it paid off. I don't know that there is a perfect answer to a game where perfection is impossible. The best approach lies somewhere in between, and it is something I plan to reflect upon more this offseason.
So what do we do now? Wait.
It's the only profitable approach. The good news: nothing has changed about Henderson or Harvey's profiles. They are talented players who still have a lot of outs. If we sell now, we will gain nothing, and we will be devastated if/when they take on larger roles.
Having said that, it's time to get them away from your starting lineups. Henderson is well behind Rhamondre Stevenson in the pecking order, and Antonio Gibson is getting some work too.

We have a similar situation in Denver with J.K. Dobbins leading the way and Tyler Badie transforming the backfield into a three-way split instead of two.

Stevenson and Harvey DOWNGRADE to borderline RB3 status until we see signs of a change.
In Week 1, Tyrone Tracy dominated New York's backfield. However, it was Cam Skattebo leading the way in Week 2. The rookie garnered the most snaps with 51% and led the team in rushing attempt share at 55%. Tracy retained the two-minute work, but Skattebo equalled him in route participation at 42%.

It's hard to know how the Giants will handle their backfield moving forward; it could be a hot-hand approach. Still, there is a chance Skattebo has moved into the driver's seat after only one game.
Skattebo UPGRADES to mid-range RB3 status and is available in 40% of Yahoo leagues.
In Week 1, Conner handled 64% of the snaps versus 34% for Benson. That evolved into a 52% versus 48% split in Week 2, with Benson taking over as the Cardinals' lead pass-down back.

Through two games, Conner still holds a significant lead over Benson in total opportunities.
For the season, the snap share is 59% versus 40% for Conner and Benson, respectively. Conner's closest Utilization Score comps have averaged 13 fantasy points per game, with 60% of them finishing between RB24 and RB30. We saw 23% carve out an RB7 to RB18 finish.
Conner DOWNGRADES to low-end RB2 status. Benson UPGRADES to RB4 territory and should be rostered in most formats—he is available in 48% of leagues.
Jerome Ford led the team with a 49% snap share, but how long he can maintain that seems very shaky given that Judkins led the team in attempts after one week of practice. The rookie handled 48% of the rushing attempts, scoring 10.1 fantasy points.

We could see a three-way committee continue for the immediate future, but expect Judkins to take over the early-down work sooner rather than later.
Judkins UPGRADES to low-end RB3 status and offers RB2 upside once in his full role. He is available in 40% of leagues.
Dylan Sampson and Jerome Ford will joust for the RB2 duties—hopefully, they don't share them. In that scenario, they would both be worthless.
Bhayshul Tuten stepped into the RB2 role with a 31% rush share on his way to 15.4 fantasy points in Week 2 against the Bengals. He didn't play much on passing downs with a 13% route participation, but was heavily targeted when on the field with a 33% targets per route run (TPRR).

Travis Etienne Jr. is locked as the No. 1 back for the Jaguars and is a mid-range RB2.
Tuten UPGRADES to RB5 territory and should be rostered in all leagues—he is the primary cuff to Etienne. He is available in 45% of leagues.
Okay. This wasn't a shakeup. It was more of the same on the Utilization front. Walker and Charbonnet were almost in identical roles to Week 1, with Charbonnet acting as the RB1.

However, Walker was the far more productive runner, leading to 18.8 fantasy points. That has Walker's fantasy managers hoping the team makes changes in Week 3. While that is possible, it isn't a lock—based on my research, superior efficiency (playing better) doesn't always unlock more playing time the way we think it would for backs. Of course, Walker has been the lead back before, which might help in this particular instance.
Right now, neither one of these backs is very attractive in fantasy, nuking each other's value.
Utilization Score comparisons:
Not good, y'all! We need this backfield to break free from an even committee approach. Both are borderline RB3s at the moment.
A few players pop up weekly in the fantasy boxscore but lack the underlying goods to back them up. They are best left for the next fantasy manager to worry about.
Donnie Brasco: "You should give it to somebody who doesn't know any better because that's a fugazi."
